Sunday, 13 February 2011

How useful is the production of culture perspective in understanding the birth of Rock 'n' Roll?

Peterson explores the birth of rock ‘n’ roll and explains that some statements are myths, such as: the emergence of a group of creative artists in the 1950s are responsible for Rock ‘n’ Roll. Instead, Peterson suggests there were 6 significant factors which are responsible for the birth of Rock ‘n’ Roll. These are: law, technology, industry, organisation, career and market. 
This article is useful as a production of culture perspective in understanding the birth of Rock ‘n’ Roll, as his suggestion makes sense and is more likely to be an accurate review. It is more likely that the 6 factors, contributed to the birth of rock ‘n’ roll rather than a random occurrence of the revolution of Rock ‘n’ Roll. 
However, there is a flaw in Peterson’s article as he doesn’t actually mention Rock ‘n’ Roll, and why the 6 factors made Rock ‘n’ Roll and not another genre. 

Sunday, 6 February 2011

Is it reasonable to consider that rock music is gendered male?


It is undeniable that the majority of rock musicians are male. According to Rolling Stone’s magazine, the top 100 guitarists are full with male musicians, without a mention of any female guitarists within the first 50. But why is this when women are just as able?

Mavis Bayton states that in rock music: ‘The reasons for women’s absence are entirely social’. For generations, traditionally, boys tend to choose to learn the guitar whilst the girls choose the piano. The guitar is a symbol of masculinity and power. Whilst there are legendary female guitarists, these days to be a successful musician, she would have to show her femininity and sex appeal. In which case, it would be more suitable for a woman to play an acoustic instrument or to be a lead vocalist.

So yes, I would say it is reasonable to consider Rock music to be gendered male. 

Saturday, 29 January 2011

Can popular music ever really be unplugged?

Unplugged music is an expression given to music which uses instruments in their natural forms for eg. Without amplifiers, microphones or even a device for recording what is being played.

So, can popular music ever really be unplugged?

Let's say your idea of popular music is folk music or opera music, which you go and listen to live in a very intimate space. In this case, it is possible for popular music to truley be "unplugged". However, generally speaking, popular music is music heard by a great amount of people and therefor in order to reach the mass public, the music would have had to be recorded. This is not achievable without some sort of microphone. And finally, in order to achieve the right balance of sound by each instrument, amplifiers would also be used.

Seeing as devices such as the microphone, the amplifier and a recording device needs to be used so that music can reach the masses, popular music cannot ever really be unplugged. This is the same for acoustic music.

Sunday, 23 January 2011

What is popular music?

Over the last few centuries the definition of the word 'popular' has changed and today's definition has been reversed from that of the 16th century. According to Raymond Williams, 'Keywords'(1976), in the 16th century the word 'popular' meant : ' low or base, vulgar, of the common people'. However, these days the word 'popular' stands for something good and 'widely favoured'.

The question, what is popular music is difficult to answer as it has no single response. What can be considered to be 'popular music' us unique and different to the individual. Music, like most things, have genres, whether it be folk, hip hop, indie, classical or rock. These genres have their own audiences ad fans which therefore would alter what is considered to be popular.